Sunday, April 29, 2018

It Moved! Early Pitching Velocity Surgers



Pitching in baseball is a complex undertaking – a subject comprised of part art, part science. There are many interconnected variables – pitching mix, velocity, sequencing, deception, movement, control, command, game plan, framing, umpiring – many of which are difficult to quantify, making it nearly impossible to fully understand pitching performance and predict its impact on the future.

But there are still some things we think we know! For instance, last week we discussed that each tick of velocity is worth roughly 0.25 in ERA for starters and 0.40-0.45 in ERA for relievers. In that same piece, we highlighted the early decliners because fastball velocity becomes meaningful in as quickly as 10 fastballs. This time we’ll be looking at early velocity surgers—those that have seen their velocity increase since last season—keeping in mind that cold weather and early season ramp-up tend to suppress velocity. Many pitchers will likely gain roughly one tick as the season goes on, peaking in August. For our purposes, this means that even “neutral” early season velocity could indicate that pitcher might be up a tick on the season. Let’s take a look. (Data as of 4/29/18)

Biggest Surgers
Top 20 Surgers – Starting Pitchers
#
Name
IP
Fastballs
FBv_18
FBv_17
Diff
1
Daniel Gossett
7.1
83
92.8
91.5
1.3
2
Kyle Hendricks
29
309
86.8
85.8
1.0
3
Charlie Morton
29
268
96
95
1.0
4
Blake Snell
35.2
338
95.1
94.3
0.8
5
Mike Foltynewicz
32
336
96.1
95.3
0.8
6
Junior Guerra
22
247
92.5
91.9
0.6
7
Andrew Triggs
23
202
89.5
88.9
0.6
8
Kenta Maeda
20.1
161
92
91.5
0.5
9
Brent Suter
30.1
323
86.2
85.8
0.4
10
Dallas Keuchel
36
337
89.1
88.7
0.4
11
Jake Arrieta
24.2
250
92.4
92.1
0.3
12
Lance Lynn
18.2
309
92.1
91.8
0.3
13
Vince Velasquez
26
286
94.2
93.9
0.3
14
J.A. Happ
29
356
92
91.8
0.2
15
Kendall Graveman
28.1
318
93.6
93.4
0.2
16
Trevor Cahill
12
83
91.1
90.9
0.2
17
Derek Holland
25
253
91.2
91.1
0.1
18
Zach Davies
28.1
241
89.8
89.7
0.1
19
Luke Weaver
26
267
93.3
93.2
0.1
20
Kyle Gibson
27
274
92.1
92
0.1

Kyle Hendricks is moving from Weavering levels to, well, slightly less Weavering levels. Hendricks has always relied on command more than velocity, but at least his velo isn’t continuing to trend in the wrong direction. Even so, I’m not totally buying his 3.10 ERA. His FIP and SIERA currently sit at 4.70 and 3.88, respectively, and he’s not inducing as many swings on pitches outside of the zone while allowing more contact on pitches inside the zone. Additionally, he’s developed a bit of a HR problem so far (1.55 HR/9), although to be fair, xStats indicates he should be closer to 1.1 xHR/9. Putting it all together, Hendricks has a profile that tends to consistently beat his ERA indicators, so there’s precedent here. Still, it’s not a profile I’m actively buying beyond his Steamer ROS projections of 3.90 ERA.    

Somehow Charlie Morton has added another velocity increase to his belt, increasing from 93 in earlier in his career to 96 in the early going this season! He appears to be the real deal, aided in our rotisserie games by increased win chances as a result of playing for one of the best teams in baseball. His strikeout rate is up to 29% and his groundball rate is up to 59%. His 3.91 FIP and 3.19 SIERA aren’t buying the 1.86 ERA – not that anyone should be – but I think they might be discounting potentially bad HR luck thus far, as he’s seen 22.2% of flyballs leave the yard resulting in a 1.24 HR/9, while xStats suggests that should be much lower (0.4 xHR/9). I’m buying Morton’s strikeout and groundball gains, but it should be noted that his innings career-high is 171 IP back in 2011 with the Pirates (his innings from 2012-2017 have been 50, 116, 157, 129, 146). His price has probably skyrocketed since draft day, but he could be worth an inquiry in case his owner sees this as a sell high opportunity. I’d be buying.

Blake Snell has parlayed his increased velocity into a higher swinging strike rate (from 10.8% to 13.8%) and strikeout rate nearing 30%, doubling his K-BB% in the process from 11% last season to 22% this season. His 2.90 FIP and 3.29 SIERA are mostly buying his early 2.52 ERA. Expect a little HR regression from his current 0.76 HR/9 (xStats suggests it should be 0.9 xHR/9), but with the improved strikeout and walk rates and increased velo, I’m buying and will take the under on his ROS projections (3.50-3.70 ERA).

Mike Foltynewicz has always been a bit of a tease, flashing plus velocity but not delivering commensurate results. This year has been a bit different with Folty the owner of a shiny 2.53 ERA so far. That’s good! I can’t say I’m totally buying him – and certainly not the 2.53 ERA – but there are a few things going well. He’s always had plus velocity, but the extra tick is nice and his strikeout rate is up from 20.7% to 29.3%. He’s relied less on the sinker and more on the changeup this year, giving batters different looks and a more complete arsenal. He’s also inducing less contact both inside and outside of the zone. HOWEVAH (Stephen A. Smith voice), he’s also inducing fewer swings both inside and outside the zone, which may be driving his walk rate up from 8.5% to 11.3%. Even so, Folty’s owners are playing with house money right now as he didn’t cost much on draft day, and while ROS projections aren’t crazy about him (4.30-4.80 ERA, 1.30-1.40 WHIP), I’m taking the under on those amid his 18% K-BB%, 3.87 FIP, 3.70 SIERA, and 0.7 xHR/9 (against an actual 1.13 HR/9).

Junior Guerra flashed brief relevance back in 2016 when he ran a 2.81 ERA, 3.71 FIP, 4.42 SIERA, 1.13 WHIP, and 11.6% K-BB%. After an injury-riddled 2017, his velocity is back up closer to the 94 we saw in 2016, and his K-BB% is up to 15%. He’s pounding the zone right now and inducing fewer swinging strikes than last season so I’m hesitant to fully buy the 23% strikeout rate, but he could be a useful pitcher – probably closer to his 4.05 SIERA than his 2.77 FIP, but better than his ROS projections (4.60-5.00 ERA, 1.40-1.50 WHIP).

Andrew Triggs has likely been better than his 4.70 ERA suggests, holding a 14% K-BB%, 3.75 FIP, and 3.97 SIERA. His GB% is also up to 53% this season and combined with his spacious home park, he profiles as a useful back-of-the-rotation fantasy arm.

Kenta Maeda will always be a casualty of creative rotation-ing, as he’s currently on pace for roughly 120-130 innings – similar to the 134 innings he threw last season. In the innings he has pitched this season, though, he’s been (mostly) straight fire. He currently holds a 33.7% strikeout rate and 6.5% walk rate, resulting in a pristine 27.2% K-BB%, good for 7th among pitchers with at least 20 innings. One thing to note is that, while homers haven’t been a problem, his WHIP is a ghastly 1.48, although its likely driven by a crazy .434 BABIP. His 1.80 FIP and 2.64 SIERA are clearly regressing that closer to a league average of roughly .300, which makes sense, but I find it curious that his exit velocity allowed has jumped from 85.4 to 90.2 MPH this season. I’d rather bet on his elite strikeouts and walks thus far, but his lower innings ceiling and higher exit velo allowed is giving me a bit of pause, and certainly worth watching. Overall, this is a profile to like – ROS projections suggest a 3.40-3.70 ERA and 1.16-1.20 WHIP – but pump the brakes due to lack of volume.

The rest of these surgers have seen velocity increase by only 0.4 or less. Given that velocity increases as the season goes on, peaking in August, it’s a good sign to see them up early in the season, all but guaranteeing they won’t see a season-over-season velocity drop assuming they avoid injury. Each is worth looking into given the could, in theory, be up at least one tick on the year. If I had to choose one name to call out, I’m particularly interested in Trevor Cahill, who looked like a very good pitcher early last season with the Padres before an oblique injury put him on the DL and he was traded to the Royals. He was never the same after, but now calls Oakland home. Given his low cost, I’ll buy his early 30.4% strikeout rate (just 12 innings) and see where he takes me. 

Biggest Surgers
Top 20 Surgers – Relief Pitchers
#
Name
IP
Fastballs
FBv_18
FBv_17
Diff
1
Amir Garrett
14.2
123
94.1
91.7
2.4
2
Seth Lugo
14.1
118
93
91.1
1.9
3
Collin McHugh
10.2
91
91.9
90.2
1.7
4
Tyler Glasnow
15.1
210
95.7
94.6
1.1
5
Roberto Osuna
11.1
113
95.4
94.6
0.8
6
Robert Gsellman
14
122
93.5
92.7
0.8
7
Miguel Castro
16.1
139
96.2
95.6
0.6
8
Oliver Drake
12.2
122
92.5
91.9
0.6
9
Brad Peacock
12.2
113
92.6
92.1
0.5
10
Tony Barnette
2.2
27
93.4
92.9
0.5
11
Jordan Lyles
16.1
108
94.3
93.8
0.5
12
Bud Norris
13.1
114
94.5
94.1
0.4
13
Austin Pruitt
14.2
97
92
91.6
0.4
14
John Brebbia
5
43
94.6
94.2
0.4
15
Matt Andriese
13.1
106
92.4
92.1
0.3
16
Matt Bowman
11.1
142
91.3
91
0.3
17
Ryan Tepera
12.2
120
95.2
95
0.2
18
Jesse Chavez
15.2
106
92.2
92
0.2
19
Ryan Madson
13
131
95.4
95.2
0.2
20
Aaron Loup
9.1
95
92.1
91.9
0.2

Five of the first six on the list are to be expected – all (except Osuna) have moved from the rotation to the bullpen so far this season. Speaking of, Roberto Osuna is an interesting name on the list, as the added velocity could take him from being a second-tier to elite closer, particularly with Kenley Jansen and Craig Kimbrel appearing mortal (and showing on last week’s decliner’s article).

Bud Norris has been amazing this season, like Cahill above, re-capturing some of his early season magic from last season. While I don’t believe he’ll retain the closing job – the Cardinals invested $14M in Greg Holland to close – he might be an elite guy in saves plus holds leagues, with a 38.5% strikeout rate and 3.9% walk rate. If Holland continues to falter, Norris could accumulate saves longer than expected.

WRAPPING UP
Going back to our introductory piece on which stats to look at early in the season, we’ve concluded our looks at pitcher fastball velocity, which become meaningful very quickly. In the pieces to come, we’ll look at other interesting trends that have become meaningful early in the season, such as pitcher’s arsenals and hitter’s exit velocities. Stay tuned!

Aaron Sauceda Web Developer

Morbi aliquam fringilla nisl. Pellentesque eleifend condimentum tellus, vel vulputate tortor malesuada sit amet. Aliquam vel vestibulum metus. Aenean ut mi aucto.

No comments:

Post a Comment